Historically
Google searches
Trade media
Referrals
Sales introductions
Trade shows
Today
Using A-tools (ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini, Grok, Perplexity, and Siri)
YouTube "how it works" explanations
LinkedIn proof from engineers, operators, and customers
Peer Discussion and industry forums
Emerging
Without visible evidence of how the company operates, what differentiates its products/services, and where it performs, buyers place their confidence in competitors.
When Google shows AI-generated summaries, users click links far less often.
This shifts where trust is earned, from clicks to confirmation.
Ranking and paid ads can still create awareness.
But awareness is no longer the main hurdle.
AI tools elevate what buyers can independently verify across the open web:
Teaching · demonstrations · how it works · real-world explanations · experiences · third-party validation · public visibility
The real burden now is credibility buyers can verify without talking to sales.
Campaigns · content · websites · social activity · trade show presence
Some of it is well executed.
Some of it is effective.
But most companies are only covering part of what buyers now need to decide.
A small number of large, sophisticated industrial organizations have adapted.
That gap is where challenger companies can gain disproportionate ground.
Focused improvements in how proof is created, distributed, and validated can produce outsized gains in trust, demand, and reputation growth.
Marketing didn't stop working. The way the marketplace buys changed.
What does this company actually do?
How does it work in real operating environments?
Can I defend this choice internally?
If answers aren't easy to find, buyers move on.
Sales isn't failing.
It's being invited in after your buyers’ opinions have already formed.
Buyers form their shortlist before sales ever gets involved.
In industrial purchases, contracts are signed by companies —
but individuals own the outcome.
If it goes wrong, it shows up as:
Downtime
Safety exposure
Missed output
Warranty claims
Reliability risk
Reputation
Buyers look for evidence that makes a decision easier to defend.
Not claims. Not promises.
Buyers trust what’s been proven, not what’s been positioned.
See it work.
Clear, observable proof — real use cases, demonstrations, customers, and references.
Understand why it works.
Straightforward explanations grounded in engineering, experience, and real constraints — not slogans.
Trust it will work for them.
Evidence that’s relevant to their environment, scale, and operating conditions.
Defend the decision internally.
Clear language and examples buyers can share with peers, leadership, and procurement without sounding like marketing.
See it confirmed elsewhere.
Confidence grows when the same proof shows up across independent sources — customers, partners, trade media, industry forums, and live demonstrations.
From steel, automotive systems, and industrial machinery to data-center infrastructure, medical devices, and advanced components, buyers decide the same way.
SIDEBAR: Gore-Tex
We didn’t tell people Gore-Tex worked.
We proved it.
Gore-Tex manufactures advanced waterproof-breathable fabric membranes.
They don’t make outerwear or footwear — their customers do.
We helped Gore-Tex educate their customers’ customers — first responders, military personnel, and professionals operating in demanding conditions.
That created a challenge: performance isn’t judged in theory.
It’s judged in the rain.
So we built a mobile rain room.
We outfitted people in products made with Gore-Tex.
We let them step into wind and driving rain.
The conversation stopped being:
“Will this keep me dry?”
And became:
“Why would I choose anything else?”

Experience-based learning
Real-world application and performance footage
In-field demonstrations
Customer installations and use cases
Clear, practical “how it works” explanations
Education from engineers and operators
Expert commentary and category leadership
Coverage in trade publications and industry forums
Independent reviews and third-party validation
And it has to live where buyers actually learn:
LinkedIn and YouTube — with your website supporting the ‘system,’ not carrying it alone.
This is where buying decisions actually form.
AI tools don’t create credibility.
They surface and reflect what already exists across the open web.
AI tools don’t create credibility.
They surface and reflect what already exists across the open web.
If your company’s proof isn’t visible and ongoing,
it won’t appear in answers —
and sales won’t make the shortlist or get the call.
Across portfolio companies, this compounds into slower organic growth —
not because value propositions are weak,
but because buyer confidence forms elsewhere.
The result: longer cycles, price pressure, and compressed multiples.
Today, companies must act like publishers, creating and distributing their proof consistently across multiple channels.
Translate real capability into market confidence — so sales gets the call.
Diagnostically
Identify visibility gaps and proof deficits before they quietly remove the company from buyer consideration.
Strategically
Design commercial infrastructure that preserves what made the business valuable — and makes it clear to modern buyers.
Executionally
Operationalize real-world proof — explanations, demonstrations, validation — across the channels buyers actually use to decide.
Buyers decide before sales gets involved. That’s where I work.
Marketing Werks
Led company growth to a successful exit
Led the scaling of a Fortune 500–focused agency, generating 80% of net-new business growth:
Bridgestone
Discover Card
GM
Lego
Nike
PlayStation
Target
United Healthcare
Verizon
agencyEA
Led company-wide change management
Revenue growth
Client retention
Team retention
AKA Partners
Led commercial transformation leading to acquisition
Client transition to direct enterprise (from 98% sub-supplier)
Ace Hardware
Astellas Pharma
FCL Builders
FabTech-IGM
Kimberly-Clark
SAC Wireless, A Nokia Company
CLOSE-UP: AI-Driven Research
The Proof Gap explains why capable industrial and B2B companies are increasingly excluded before sales is ever contacted—even when their products, teams, and performance remain strong.The paper examines what has changed in buyer research, how many organizations react by increasing activity or messaging, and why those responses often overcorrect and fail to restore consideration. It concludes by reframing the issue as a leadership decision and outlines what leaders must do differently to remain visible and credible while buyers decide who to trust.
